Clinical Studies

C-Section

Surgical Site Infection in Cesarean Sections with the Use of a Plastic Sheath Wound Retractor Compared to the Traditional Self-Retaining Metal Retractor

Published: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology; 2016 August
Authors: Hinkson L, Siedentopf JP, Weichert A, Henrich W. Surgical site infection in cesarean sections with the use of a plastic sheath wound retractor compared to the traditional self-retaining metal retractor. <em>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.</em> 2016;203:232-238. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.003
Excerpt: “[T]he use of plastic-sheath wound retractors such as the Alexis® O C-Section Retractor compared to the traditional Collins self-retaining metal retractor in low risk women, having the first cesarean is associated with a significantly reduced risk of surgical site infection. There is significant reduction in the use of electric cautery for subcutaneous bleeding, bowel handling and postoperative pain. Operator satisfaction is improved and postoperative pain is less. . . .”
Read the full article

Effects of Methods of Uterine Repair on Surgical Outcome of Cesarean Delivery

Published: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics; 2010 November
Authors: Doganay M, Tonguc EA, Var T. Effects of method of uterine repair on surgical outcome of cesarean delivery. <em>Int J Gynaecol Obstet.</em> 2010;111(2):175-178. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.009
Excerpt: “We found the operating time and the time to return of bowel function to be shorter, and the rates of uterine atony, wound infection, and request for additional postoperative analgesics to be lower, among patients who underwent uterine repair in situ rather than extra-abdominally. . . .”
Read the full article

Complications of Exteriorized Compared With In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Published: Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2007 September
Authors: Siddiqui M, Goldszmidt E, Fallah S, Kingdom J, Windrim R, Carvalho JC. Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. <em>Obstet Gynecol.</em> 2007;110(3):570-575. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000277712.67230.22
Excerpt: “Exteriorization of the uterus for repair is associated with an increased incidence of nausea and vomiting and tachycardia during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Uterine repair should be done in situ where possible.”
Read the full article

Influence of Uterine Exteriorization Versus In Situ Repair on Post-Cesarean Maternal Pain: A Randomized Trial

Published: International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia; 2007 April
Authors: Nafisi S. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial. <em>Int J Obstet Anesth.</em> 2007;16(2):135-138. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.10.009
Excerpt: “This prospective study included 206 women who underwent cesarean delivery . . . Exteriorization of the uterus for repair of the uterine incision increases the first- and second-night post-operative pain significantly. . .”
Read the full article